Skip to main content

Reddit Field of Science

Edit: This project has moved to its reddit url: http://www.reddit.com/r/FoS/

If you're wondering what I do all day (like I sometimes do), I'm often tinkering under the hood of Field of Science. More often than not it's stuff that doesn't amount to much, or stuff that no one but me is likely to notice or care about. Yesterday, however, my tinkering resulted in something that is worth sharing if only because it will give you some insight into how I think and how I see FOS as constantly evolving.

I forget how exactly, but I ended up on reddit. You'll no doubt recognize their little alien mascot. Reddit, it turns out, allows you to create your own reddit and host it on your own domain. What for? Worry about that later. What's important is it can be done, so under the hood I go. Fast forward a few hours and... fos.fieldofscience.com. Not perfect--reddit runs its ads and I still need to customize the look a bit--but functionally (once you figure out what to do with it), reddit-dot-field-of-science works like a charm.

So back to the what for? The way I see it, a community bookmarking/rating/commenting tool (which is what reddit is) could be a great way for a science tribe to collaborate and enrich itself. But it's a bit too soon for that. Our science tribe is not big enough (yet). Nevertheless, Field of Reddit is a good example of the types of projects I naturally gravitate toward (when left to my own devices). It also gives you some insight into how I imagine Field of Science. FOS is not a static website with preset round and square holes that you either fit into or you don't. Rather, FOS is an amorphous, evolving, fluid collection of tools and experiments and projects and ideas... In other words, FOS exists to serve its tribe, and what it is at any given moment is a reflection of the collective and individual needs of its tribe. So when I say FOS is evolving, I really mean it. My role is that of occasional catalyst and constant enabler.

Anyway, back to the nuts and bolts. A quick outline and some instructions before I can put this on the back burner.
I've set reddit fieldofscience as Restricted (anyone can view, but only contributors can submit links) for now. If you want to become a contributor, register per the instructions below and send me your reddit username.

1. Register.


2. Create your account.


3. Install the bookmarklets.


4. Be sure to select the subreddit FoS when submitting new links.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A New Wave of Science Blogging?

One can imagine science bloggers would be a (the) primary beneficiary in a landscape where Google ranks sites based on the correctness of factual information provided by the [blog] .  What's more, it is not a stretch to conclude that science bloggers could very well be in the vanguard of a new wave of bloggers who earn Google’s trust by blogging within the confines of what is known. The news that Google is working on a system of ranking sites based on the quality of their facts should be greeted by science bloggers everywhere as a game-changer.

Are Female Science Bloggers More Likely To Blog Anonymously Than Male Science Bloggers?

Google+'s real name policy sparked a lively debate in the science blogosphere. On the side of anonymity it was observed that women risk more than men when they use their real names. We know that women experience 25 TIMES the amount of harassment online that men do. I light of this blanket disparity in risk you might expect to find--or even assume--that the percentage of women in science blogging anonymously is greater than that of their male counterparts. Sifting through the Census of Science Bloggers data I realized I had a sample with which to test this assumption. But to get there I first had to answer another burning question: I wonder what the overall gender ratio is among science bloggers?   The answer, based on the census data, is approximately 2 male science bloggers for every 1 female science blogger. Again, based on the census sample, 15% of all science bloggers post anonymously. Now does that percentage change when you divvy the sample up into male and female?

How to tell the difference between a Science Blog Network, a Fanny Pack and a Backpack

This is a network: http://scienceblogs.com This is a fanny pack: http://blogs.nature.com This is a backpack: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/science-blogs/ This is a network: http://www.fieldofscience.com/ This is a fanny pack: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ This is a backpack: http://gu.com/scienceblogs This is a network: http://sciblogs.co.nz/ This is a fanny pack: http://blogs.plos.org This is a backpack: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/ This is a network: http://scientopia.org/ This is a fanny pack: http://gam.southernfriedscience.com/ This is a backpack: http://www.labspaces.net/blogs