Skip to main content

How to tell the difference between a Science Blog Network, a Fanny Pack and a Backpack

This is a network: http://scienceblogs.com
This is a fanny pack: http://blogs.nature.com
This is a backpack: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/science-blogs/

This is a network: http://www.fieldofscience.com/
This is a fanny pack: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/
This is a backpack: http://gu.com/scienceblogs

This is a network: http://sciblogs.co.nz/
This is a fanny pack: http://blogs.plos.org
This is a backpack: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/

This is a network: http://scientopia.org/
This is a fanny pack: http://gam.southernfriedscience.com/
This is a backpack: http://www.labspaces.net/blogs

Comments

  1. Errr... must be a cultural thing, but I just did not get this post! :( Can someone explain, please?

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Pranab: That's a good question. I'm not exactly sure myself, but if I had to guess, I'd break it down like this:

    A fanny pack (in spite of its name) is usually worn facing front, like this: http://blogs.nature.com

    A backpack (with rare exception) is usually worn on the back, like this: http://gu.com/scienceblogs

    Anyway, that's as far as I get.

    ReplyDelete
  3. But that don't make no sense! The blogs on FoS are also blogname.fieldofscience.com. That makes them fanny packs too! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, let's actually break it down as you suggest and see where we end up.

    If you lose the fanny pack (http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/), you get http://discovermagazine.com/, which self identifies as a "Magazine."

    If you discard the backpack (http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/science-blogs/), you get http://www.wired.com/, which also purports to be a "Magazine."

    But if you drop the "blog" (http://epiphenom.fieldofscience.com/) you get http://www.fieldofscience.com/, which describes itself as a "Science Blog Network."

    ReplyDelete
  5. So are you saying that just because these other websites do other things they can't call themselves networks?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have to admit the humour is a little lost on me too (part of it’ll just be that a 'fanny pack' is an American expression), but thanks for mentioning our lot: http://sciblogs.co.nz/

    (I write Code for life over that way...)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Edward, you've made similar comments in the past and I'm just trying to understand your point. I hope this isn't the typical blog network shit flinging I come to expect from less reputable bloggers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm a super nice guy Brian. Ask anyone.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A New Wave of Science Blogging?

One can imagine science bloggers would be a (the) primary beneficiary in a landscape where Google ranks sites based on the correctness of factual information provided by the [blog].  What's more, it is not a stretch to conclude that science bloggers could very well be in the vanguard of a new wave of bloggers who earn Google’s trust by blogging within the confines of what is known.

The news that Google is working on a system of ranking sites based on the quality of their facts should be greeted by science bloggers everywhere as a game-changer.

The Census of Science Bloggers Wants You!

The response thus far to the Census of Science Bloggers (2011) has been rather remarkable, especially when you consider it started on a Friday (never a good day to announce). But it's Monday now, which means it's time for this census worker--a hat I'll be wearing for the rest of August--to get to work.

The Challenge:How to circulate the Science Blogger Census to the whole of the science blogosphere in such a way that it doesn't become tedious?

Having thought about it, I can't say that I've come up with a perfect solution, but I do have a plan that at least tries to minimize the pain.

I would ask you, dear science blogger, to join me as a census worker and collect one census from one science blogger you personally know. You will send them a link to this very post (http://goo.gl/FzzZa) where they will find a link to the census form (http://goo.gl/2R31w) and these same instructions requesting that they do as you did--complete the census form and collect a single cen…

Madagavatar

The list of people who have voiced their objections to Avatar for one reason or another . . . is long. Most, of course, are simply trying to hitch their particular agenda to Avatar's success--evenifthatmeanstheyhavetorubshoulderswiththeirideologicalfoes.



As for me, I only have praise for Avatar. It succeeded on every level. It was exactly what it needed to be.

Nevertheless, I've detected something in Avatar's wake that is somewhat bothersome to me. It strikes me that audiences and critics are dismissing out of hand the environmental rape depicted in Avatar as if it were just another stretch of James Cameron's sci-fi imagination. This group denial of Avatar's nod to realism has served to remind me that humans are really and truly willfully ignorant of the severity and extent of the environmental atrocities being committed by us in the name of progress, greed and humanity each and every day, right here on planet earth.

What's more, that there is such a thing as '…